Notes for a “Cinderella” Reboot Nobody Needs

Walt Disney's CinderellaThis weekend I revisited Walt Disney’s twelfth animated classic Cinderella for the first time since the late 1990s. Of all the numerous Disney films our family has owned in multiple formats, this is one of several that rarely saw repeat viewings even when my son was a toddler who insisted on watching every animated movie over and over again until I hated it.

As with many older Disney films, parts of it have aged better than others. I’ll admit I had trouble staying conscious all the way through. Even if I’m alone in this struggle, the film is now over sixty years old and therefore in need of a gratuitous overhaul on shallow principle. In the spirit of today’s remake-happy medium that thrives on second-hand ideas, the following notes are my suggestions to downconvert this one-time children’s favorite for the modern, unsophisticated audience that Hollywood executives so dearly crave:

1. We need to believe that Cinderella’s dad would have good reasons to want to marry the wicked stepmother. As drawn and acted, she’s a horse-faced harpy. Was she, once upon a time, a gregarious looker? Were they married for so long that her looks and demeanor have simply deteriorated over time? Was the marriage that hard on her? What does that say about dearly departed Dad? Cinderella’s trauma at his loss means he wasn’t an unlovable tyrant, so the only other sensible option is that he was a spineless doormat forced into marriage by this conniving harridan. Clearly we need copious non-linear flashbacks to Dad and Stepmom’s deceptively happy wedding day before it all went wrong, when he turned into Walter Mitty and she became Miss Hannigan from Annie.

2. We also need flashbacks about Cinderella’s mom, for extra contrast and double the angst. While I’m thinking about it, Cinderella’s parents both being dead under nebulous circumstances cannot be left as mere coincidence. It should obviously be established, but not revealed to everyone until ten minutes from the end, that the stepmother was involved in both deaths, whether by subtle implication or by unrepentant, wild-eyed confession.

3. Making villainesses ugly is no longer cool. This stereotyping of us homely people has been passé for decades. To that end, both stepsisters should be recast as mean-girl fashion models, because stereotyping the photogenic never goes out of style.

4. The Tom and Jerry antics that pad out the first thirty-five-minutes need to be toned down. We’re never told why Cinderella has talking mice as her silent partners. Why, of all the orphans in the world, do they help her? Is it because they conveniently share the same tenement? I suppose talking mice have to live somewhere, and Casa Evil Stepmom is as good a place as any, but this seems too pat and not nearly overexplained enough. In my new version, the mice still assist her, but with more competence and solemnity. They’re not there to be cute; they’re there because their race’s ancient prophecy pointed them in this direction, and all augurs point to Cinderella being the Chosen One who would deliver all races from evil of a sort (TBD). Instead of being squeaky and full of slapstick, they should basically be armored ripoffs of David Petersen’s Mouse Guard. That half-hour of fumbling horseplay should be replaced with humorless soliloquys, lectures about their civilization’s history, and at least ten minutes of filking.

5. Old-fashioned musical numbers? Not in today’s world. Random insertions of whatever’s topping the iTunes sales chart one month before release will do, though we’ll also need one original song for Oscar consideration. Ideally, this will be a new Taylor Swift track about whichever famous boyfriend she’s dumped most recently, but with lyrics that tangentially reference anything in the movie. My suggested title would be “You Turned Back into a Rat Long Before Midnight”.

6. Remember how the mice spent all that time, energy, and musicality while altering her dead mom’s decent-looking dress, only to have the stepsisters shred it in seconds, thus making their big number moot? None of that wastefulness now. The doomed dress should be fine as-is, revealed instead as already pretty because Cinderella has been modifying it herself slowly over the course of years, but kept hidden in the back of her closet until just the right occasion (or so she thought). With this rewrite, Cinderella is even more anguished watching the stepsisters tear apart her months of skillful, well-meaning, totally solo handiwork. Net benefit: guys in the audience are spared long, torturous minutes of sewing action.

7. The fairy godmother needs backstory. Any backstory. In the original, she appears from nowhere as if Cinderella’s weeping counted as a prayer at her fairy temple. This odd spirituality is almost vague enough for Hollywood purposes, but too closely resembles the grace of a monotheistic God. Fairy Godmother 2.0 will be a seeress keeping tabs on Our Heroine because her own visions aligned with those of the vermin oracles in perceiving Cinderella as the Chosen One whose fate must be safeguarded for the good of all Cinderearth.

8. Slippers made of glass? No. Upscale $300 product-placement shoes from one of those R-rated TV shows for women? Much more like it.

9. The movie ends with dramatic shoe try-ons. Again, perhaps this plays well with an all-female audience, but one might want to consult with the makers of The Princess and the Frog about the importance of unisex marketing. Like most other films today, Disney or otherwise, we’ll need a battle at the end instead of a shopping-mall showdown. The easiest way out would be for Stepmom to reveal she’s an evil witch, and her cat Lucifer is naturally her familiar. While Stepmom transforms into a fifteen-foot-tall monster, Fairy Godmother magicks up one nifty broadsword for Cinderella, who wields it nimbly despite no prior experience whatsoever, because Chosen One. Clashing and clanging ensues.

10. While that final battle rages on, the fashion-model stepsisters, likewise revealed to be inhuman henchwomen, summon forth thousands of evil sisters from their home dimension to overrun Prince Charming’s castle and destroy the world. Charming’s army springs forth, as do the League of Sword-Fighting Rodents, the extra-chirpy Birds of War, and a handful of spare Fairy Godmothers. This is because every fantasy now has to end with a war. It’s a rule started by Lord of the Rings, then perpetuated by The Chronicles of Narnia, Snow White and the Huntsmen, and several other LOTR wannabes. Who am I to break with new tradition?

It goes without saying that the movie ends on a cliffhanger hinting at the true villain behind the scenes who’s been pulling the stepfamily’s strings. Thus concludes Part One of The Cinderearth Trilogy.

If any of this has already been done in all the previous Cinderella renditions I’ve never bothered to watch, it doesn’t even matter. Audiences love the familiar and respond well to repetition, especially the younger ones raised in complete ignorance of those previous renditions. Even if viewers recognize bits from Ever After or Ella Enchanted, who cares? Thievery and recycling are the two best things about rebooting.

8 responses

    • Amen! Even worse are those films (kiddie or otherwise) that, instead of new disposable musical acts, reuse the same handful of oldies over and over again. If I never hear “YMCA”, “All-Star”, “Celebration”, or “Back in Black” in films ever again, I’ll count myself lucky.


  1. I was wondering when someone was going to start asking what Cinderella’s father was thinking? Did he get wasted on mead one night and accidently stumble into the wrong room at the inn? Did that wicked Brunhild then force the blacksmith’s son, who keeps his passion for art a secret, to make some embarrassing charcoal sketches of Cinderella’s father and a lusty wench so she could blackmail him into that unholy union?
    Did her two devil’s seed daughters put a spell Cinderella’s mother, who was just wondering the forest with a case of amnesia the entire time?
    We could so write a prequel and a sequel to that milk toast of a story that has been the undoing of every girl who ever believed in such a thing as Prince Charming.


    • I fully endorse this plan. I like to think many women nowadays are finding it harder to sympathize with a heroine whose master plan to save herself from oppression is to marry her way to freedom. (Okay, maybe some women are still fine with that, but should we be encouraging them?)

      As for the mysterious blacksmith’s son, we’ll learn more about his secrets and schemes in the second and third parts of “The Cinderearth Trilogy”, Cinderwar and Cinderpocalypse!


      • I absolutely don’t sympathize with anyone who isn’t even the slightest bit self aware to know that is backward thinking. Sick, twisted, gnarly toothed, butt scratching, hutch-backed, cave squatter backward. See you knew I was going to break out of my shell as soon as you gave me the go ahead. 🙂
        I love the trilogy concept. Awesome.


  2. I was talking with a friend today and she doubled over laughing at this story idea. I think we may be on to something. She watches a lot of those shows like “Snapped” and movies where dastardly deeds are the undoing of seemingly ordinary people. So, the audience for such a trilogy may be…shall we say…already headed ’round the bend?


    • I could totally see giving Cinderella’s parents a lengthier backstory, fleshing out all the happy times they had when it seemed nothing could go wrong…and then SURPRISE GOLDDIGGER. My wife’s a big fan of Snapped and all those basic-cable shows about true-murder schemes, so she’d be a great technical adviser to make sure the story sounds sufficiently melodramatic. Hmmmm…


What do you, The Viewers at Home, think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: